Name: Furry-Paws
Genre: Dog – breeding, showing
Members: 900,000+
Age: Roughly six years
Click here for link
If you’ve ever played a sim game, you’ve surely heard of Furry-Paws (affectionately known as FP). It is an old sim with a surprising amount of members. It hasn’t changed too much from how it was a few years ago, so I assume that only a few changes here and there have been made since its birth. That isn’t to say it even has to change by much. FP obviously has something working for it, which I can’t help but assume that it’s its simplicity – both in gameplay and community.
It’s not FP’s fault that it’s home to what people call “n00bs.” It just so happens that it’s the first sim of its kind for many people venturing away from Neopets. It’s a breeding ground for ten year-olds first learning the magic of the forums and the mystic of sending messages. They are in awe over the virtual canines (“OMG! They can breed!”) and swoon over the amazing showing system. I remember the feeling, as FP was my first sim, as well. I also recall doing the same as they do: going on the forum and doing whatever I felt like. It wasn’t like Neopets; you had more freedom. I abused it and so do they.
It’s not their fault necessarily. If anything, I would blame society. There’s a lot to be said about that, so I won’t get into it. It is inevitable that there will be n00bs and that they will be irritating little twits. It is also inevitable that they will grow up. Still… that takes too freaking long, so the community on FP sucks. The end. (There are the few good points, but overall, it’s an unorganized brawl.) So, COMMUNITY: 2 pts.
FP isn’t all about the community (well, after awhile, it is, but there is other stuff!). There is gameplay, which revolves around dogs: showing and breeding. There are some sims out there that only focus on certain shows and certain breeds, but FP has a wide variety – one of the largest and it definitely has something for everyone. However, FP being one of the older sims and with its lack of cosmetic updates, the overall appearance of the game is… cluttered and unimpressive. The coding is efficient and all the features function correctly, so that is good to know.
The downside to the FP gameplay is the lack of things to do. Sure, you can show, breed, and train, but those can be completed within an hour or so. If you spend as much time on the computer as me, you’ll agree that there’s not much else to do than to go onto the forums, which, as mentioned before, are not too appealing. Then there’s the problem of money being too easily obtained. Sure, you may be a little short on cash in the first month (if you buy a lot crap, that is), but eventually you start making A LOT of money. Enough to the point that 1 million FPD (dollar-like currency) is hardly a feat. That, needless to say, makes the game too easy. Which makes the game boring. GAMEPLAY: 5 pts.
Again, FP is old. It’s design is old. It’s concept is old. That means that it’s layout is way out of date. Compared to some sims, it may be fairly nice, but compared to others, it’s hardly anything. With the plain white background and sparse brown decorative graphics, it’s dull and shameful compared to what the creator is capable of. If you’ve seen her other games, she’s able to do a lot better. It’s obvious that FP is in need of several touch-ups. Kahlem (the creator) has said herself that the coding is a little sloppy and needs to be redone. Perhaps revamping the layout while you’re at it, please? I don’t see why she can’t – she’s updated Mweor’s layout several times.
Perhaps the most annoying thing about the layout is the lack of color. Again, it’s brown and white. Personally, I love that color combination; it’s classy. Unfortunately, there’s an overload of white, especially on my monitor (yay for widescreens?). Honestly, a few touch-ups could fix that problem. Add a nice background, a new navigation bar, a few tables and it’s like a whole new sim. The members wouldn’t be too opposed to that, would they? I understand Kahlem works hard, but it’s like fixing your hair all nice and pretty and then wearing a garbage bag as a dress. It negates all your efforts. LAYOUT: 2 pts.
It is a pet peeve of mine, one that simply irks me. It doesn’t actually stop me from playing a sim, but it most definitely has me rolling my eyes in annoyance. That is the frustrating irregularity of image banks. I could say that any site that has image banks is merely host to lazy artists, but I hardly think that’s the case. Well, maybe a little, but it’s just a fleeting suspicion. I think they’re really there just to give the users a variety of images to choose from. That doesn’t change the fact I hate them.
It’s rare for a breed of dog to be without images. It does happen, though. It could easily be avoided by the site artists creating official images for each breed. I would love that, personally, because it gives the site a sense of stability and I love breeding sims when the likeness of the parents is clearly displayed on the offspring in the form of markings and colors (or in Pure Felinity’s case, body structure).
Other than the image back annoyance, the various artwork throughout the site is just as inconsistent. It’s done by various artists in various styles. It may look nice, but it seems random to me. Which I don’t like. So, I’ll give FP its dues according to the beauty of the work, but I’m taking away for inconsistency. ARTWORK: 7 pts.
I don’t know the FPian staff too well, but I have spoken to a few on other sites. I understand that speaking to them on another site doesn’t really reflect their abilities as administrators and moderators, but I assume it does remove some sense of anonymity and gives me a general idea of their demeanor in typical situations. With my fascination of psychology, I’m relatively good at dissecting what people mean in messages and conversations. Still, it’s over the internet and face to face association is much more accurate. However, I am confident in my impression of a decently balanced system.
Kahlem is a dedicate administrator with ambitions for all her games. She has loyal followers who obediently do her bidding reasonably handle most situations. Considering I’ve not had trouble with the staff, nor have my friends, I’m still uncertain if their is any treachery afoot, but knowing the creator and her wise decisions concerning such important things, I highly doubt anything malicious is going on behind the scenes. Still, you never know. STAFF: 8 pts.
THE DIAGNOSIS
Community: 2/10 pts
Gameplay: 5/10 pts
Layout: 2/10 pts
Artwork: 7/10 pts
Staff: 8/10 pts
Total: 24/50 pts
Rank: Fair Game
Unfortunately, Furry-Paws is not the best game. I guess we’ll just keep looking, huh?
NO Furry-Paws can NOT be said to be the 'root' of modern sim games. Research moar.
ReplyDeleteFurry-Paws created late 2003
Virtual Horse Ranch 2003
Showdog 2002
Equination 2002
White Oak Stables 2001
Ludus Equinus 199?
Horseland 1994
It was an interesting review, your speaking voice was captivating, but your attitude was a little 'higher than thou'. Nevertheless I will be reading your other reviews when they come out.
lol @ the anonymous commenter above me. Ludus Equinus came out in 2003.
ReplyDeleteGet your facts right before you go insulting someone on their own blog. Clearly you don't know what you think you know.
To Custard, nice review. I agree that it was the root of many games IN THIS SPECIFIC SUB-GENRE. LE was probably the true root, but it never took off the way FP did.
Anyways, because I realize that my comment made me sound like I love Custard or know her somehow (I've never spoken to her)... I don't agree with everything she said. The layout, in my opinion, is perfect in its simplicity and not hard on the eyes, and I think it merited a much higher score. The colors are neutral and inoffensive. The overall effect of the layout can be cozy or airy, summery or wintry, depending on how it's done up with holiday decorations and front page pics.
ReplyDeleteI think it could be wider, but I prefer left-aligned sites, so it doesn't bother me. That being said, Mweor's layout has never grabbed me. Notice how most of the popular sites on the web (e.g. google, facebook, yahoo, etc.) have stark white backgrounds.
Then again, this is coming from someone who enjoys graphic design and scripting/programming, so I probably over-analyzed it in some ways.
@Dog Cookie: Hehehe. The layout is fair more appealing than the over-cluttered ones you find nowadays. However, I think there could be more to it. A white background isn't bad, but I think there could be more touches of the brown. If Kahlem does update FP's layout, I want her to stick with its current color scheme, as it is neutral and can easily be made seasonal (as you mentioned).
ReplyDelete@Anonymous: It can be considered the root of many modern sims. Since the creation of Furry-Paws, more and more sims have been coming out, more than half of them focusing on dogs/canines. If you look at all the sims you mentioned, they're horse sims. Horse sims are confined to certain properties, as are dog sims. Dog sims are recognized as being more "popular", as well, but that may just be the large following they get from various canine-lovers (wolves, foxes, etc) while horse-lovers are... horse-lovers.
Anyway, Furry-Paws inspired more sims than can be counted and also got thousands of people interested in online simulation games. Not to say the ones you mentioned didn't, but the romance of FP is undeniably well known by those who even dislike it. It's an original and everybody copies originals.
Interesting review. I never really got into FP, mostly because of several of the things you mentioned (general immaturity of the players etc).
ReplyDeleteI would recommend Canis Novus as a good sim game if you're looking for more to try and review.
Oh, and are you sure venatus is the word you mean? According to my memory and my dictionary it means hunting rather than game. Normally ludus is the Latin word for game...
@bookodyssey: Best Hunting, eh? Works just as well for my purposes, I suppose. My Latin teacher isn't all that good, so I'm not too surprised she gave me the wrong word on short notice. Aw well. I've gotten too attached to bother correcting the grammar at this point. It'd be tedious anyway, what with everything I've already done. ;)
ReplyDeleteNice review. ^^ Not the one I would write, haha, but then I've been there forever. Since Li put up the link on Ludus Equinus (Horse Game lol) during a day of downtime, actually. :D
ReplyDeleteAnd bonus, the comments are almost as interesting as the review. xD
I think Horseland could be said to be the root of modern sim games. Just because you switch animals doesn't mean it's no longer the root inspiration. :P If not HL, then I'd agree with Dog Cookie that it was LE, FP always seemed like a watered down, but much easier to show version to me. I think it's because Furry-Paws has a more open message board that ideas can flow easier and many people go there first to talk about new sims.
And Dog Cookie's right, LE was created just before Furry-Paws in 2003, but I think the rude Anon got everything else right. And they did post Showdog.com so it wasn't just horse games they had. Though I do think you're being kinda silly, Custard, to say horse gamers and dog gamers are all that different or that dog games are more poplar. :P A glance around the net will show more and larger horse games than dog. But I agree that FP did inspire quite a few of vocal people who actually did get their games on a webpage. ^^
@Restless: Dog sims are dog sims and horse sims are horse sims. Though there are similar properties, there are definitive lines that separate the genres. FP inspired, from what I can gather, more sims to be created on its accord than any singular sim before it.
ReplyDeleteA sole horse sim may have more members than FP, but the entire dog sim community narrowly outnumbers horse simmers. Again, this is probably due to obsessive canine-based faction that manipulates whatever dog sim they're on to suit whatever sort of canine they prefer (i.e. calling their kennel a "pack").
I think the people inhabiting the games are fairly different (I prefer horse simmers, actually, in terms of personality) buuut there are many similar aspects. There are a lot more horse games out there, and they generally seem to get more popularity and publicity than dog games. Why this is is anyone's guess--horses are less accessible for the average person, so maybe more people go online to get their horse fix. I always liked the PC horse games. Did anyone ever have 3-day eventing?!
ReplyDeleteI don't think gameplay aspects are carbon copies between a lot of horse sims and dog sims, but there has been very little innovation. Just compare sites such as Canis-Equus, Horse Phenomena, and Horseland. Equidaem is similar, even though they have genetics (that don't seem to serve much of a purpose ATM, but I could be mistaken). Howrse and HorseIsle were innovative, and for its time HL was, too. LE got into things fairly early, and FP was very close behind (and very similar in many ways).
VHR and Equination never really hit it very big at all. White Oak Stables, for all it's boasted about, is very underwhelming and not incredibly popular.
Sorry if I sounded like a female dog the other day, by the way. I don't really have any justification, just don't take anything personally, lol.
P.S.: Kah said years ago (when she was active on the downtime boards... these were old downtime boards...) that HL was one of the first games she played. *shrug*
I've been playing sim games for 12 years, so I was around when FP was actually launched.
ReplyDeleteA couple of things that I would add about FP's changes... mainly the addition of genetic colours and a change from single births to litters. The latter is actually quite interesting, since FP had originally rejected the suggestion to change to a litter system rather than single birth, but I suppose they ended up changing their minds about that. FP was not unique when they added either of those things... there was another dog sim that opened at around the same time as FP, called Pawsibilities. Paws actually had litters from its beginning and genetic colours were added very soon after the site was launched... long before FP implemented either. I also see elements of Neopets in FP... mainly in their shop system. It's just about identical, from what I remember. Ludus Equinus was obviously an inspiration as well... Kah even had something posted on FP at one point (not sure if it's there anymore or not) about how Li helped her out quite a bit. Apparently a lot of people used to think that Kah WAS Li, probably due to the similarities between the sites. Based on that sort of thing, I don't really think that FP can necessarily be said to be the 'root' of all sim games... even FP got many of their ideas by surfing other games.
I actually agree with Restless that Horseland could more correctly be termed as the root of modern sims... at least when it comes to pet sims based on real animals. Both Paws and FP, particularly at the beginning, were very obviously inspired by HL... mainly in the whole idea of a points system and the fact that showing helps points/stats and points/stats help with breeding and so forth. That was the whole basis of HL.
When it comes to FP's layout, I don't necessarily mind the colours of it, but I absolutely cannot stand the left alignment. It would be okay to have a left aligned div contain the site, but please... center that div! I have a 24" monitor and FP's entire site takes up only about 1/4 of my screen. Drives me nuts. Actually, my favorite sites have liquid layouts... I love it when a site actually makes use of my screen real estate!
Oh I loved Pawsibilities! I couldn't believe it went down so quickly. D= It was close to the ideal dog game. Didn't it even have flash based training? I distinctly remember trying to get my dog to sit through treat bribes, haha.
ReplyDeleteAnd Dog Cookie don't forget about horse sims like Hajinc and Horse Eden, where horses are either born good or bad with no improvement possible except through breeding and hoping. =P
And Custard I'd love to see your stats that say dog gamers outnumber horse gamers, because I'm almost positive that's wrong. xD I hate to argue the point, but the sheer number of horse games compared to the few dog sims makes me think the horse community is quite a bit larger.
Horseland alone has over 6 million accounts. Howrse has four and a half million. VHR has half a million. White Oak Stables has over 300,000. Spiffyhorse and Equine Ranch have just over 100,000. If they count, games like PonyIsland and Ponystars have 700,000-850,000 members each.
What about dog games? Furry-Paws is closing in on one million. Showdog actually has a list of all members that have been active in the last two weeks, which right now is 13,674 users (they don't use id numbers so no idea on how many registered accounts). Black Star Kennels has 75,000. VirtualBark has a million and a half and Wajas has just over 170,000. Are there any other dog games that have even 50,000 members?
So, yeah, I don't think the dog gaming community is really all that large compared to the horse one. Two and a half million doesn't come close to eleven million, hehe. Probably as Dog Cookie said, it's because real horses aren't as accessible as real dogs.
Unless of course you have stats to games I'm unaware of!
Plus I'm pretty sure Horseland inspired a lot more games than Furry-Paws (even if it were just based on the number of HL clones still around). =P
FP evolved from Horseland :) However I agree it's the root of most modern SIMs. Not because of the gameplay, but because the community. The people who left HL and all those other games to go and play FP are the same people who (though now older) form the core of a lot of modern day SIMs. I think FP is where that community started because it's where most of these people met each other.
ReplyDeleteOn that note, I think giving FP a 2 for community is a bit unfair in this review. For a start, if FP gets a 2, it would require sites such as Neopets and Horseland being substantially into negative digits. Also, for a site of its size, FP has got a good community. All communities are better when they're small and new. Until a little group started kicking up a stink lately (and they've now moved on) FP was pretty alright. I don't think it should be scoring full marks, but I don't think '2' is a good relative mark, unless a lot of SIMs are going to be scored very low.
Overall I think your comments are generally valid, but your marks are very low if you're going to go on and compare FP with worse sites, I think! FP has some bad points, but I don't think this review has balanced the positives so much as focussed on the negatives. All well and good until you find places with many more negatives!
I've played the game for years and it is not at all how bad you seem to think it is. You should play it, it's actually pretty good.
ReplyDelete